WebGraham v The Queen. 1998) 195 CLR 606, it was held that there should be a temporal connection between the occurrence of the asserted fact (the sexual assault in this case ) … WebGraham v R (1998) 195 CLR 606 61 c) Civil proceedings where the maker is unavailable: s 63 62 d) Civil proceedings where the maker is available: s 64 63 ... Lee v The Queen [1998] HCA 60 69 Admissions not admissible as against third parties: s 83 70 Admissions influenced by violence and other conduct: s 84 70
Graham v R [1998] HCA 61 Peter O
Webhave in fact any basis to be introduced into evidence at trial is a different matter: Graham v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 606 at 616-617. For this reason records of interview should … WebThe rule against hearsay. The rule against hearsay is set out in s. 59 (1) of the Evidence Actin the following terms: (1) Evidence of a previous representation made by a person is … list of cutting edge technology
Graham v R [1998] HCA 61; 195 CLR 606 - Student Law Notes
WebLAW313 Week 3 Hearsay and Exceptions. Papakosmas v Queen (1999) 196 CLR 298 Caterpillar Inc v John Deere Ltd (No 2) (2000) 181 ALR 108 Graham v R (1998) 195 CLR 606 Lithgow City Council v Jackson [2011] HCA 36 ASIC v Rich [2005] NSWSC 417 in particular at paras 93 to 121 Adam v R (2001) 207 CLR 696 NAB v Rusu (1999) 47 … WebDec 10, 2008 · (1) A person is not competent to give evidence about a fact if, for any reason (including a mental, intellectual or physical disability): (a) the person does not have the capacity to understand a question about the fact; or (b) the person does not have the capacity to give an answer that can be understood to a question about the fact; WebThe truthfulness and accuracy of a person whose words are spoken by another witness cannot be tested by cross examination, and the light by which his demeanour would throw on his testimony is lost.3 Hearsay is not the best evidence, because it is not the first hand account of what was observed, heard or experienced, and is therefore, generally … list of cuv vehicles