WebAugust 22, 2000 TORRES vs. CABESUELA A.M. No. P-00-1391 September 28, 2001 GOMEZ vs. CONCEPCION SPOUSES BAUTISTA vs. SULA A.M. No. P-04-1920 August 17, 2007 ALLANDALE vs. GOOD DEVELOPMENT G.R. No. 164521 December 18, 2008 P a g e 1 2 Yang v Valdez 177 S 141 Adoma v Gatcheco 448 S 299 Paat v CA 266 S 167 Citibank v CA 304 …
Case Digest: SMART COMMUNICATIONS v. REGINA M. ASTORGA
WebSMART COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. REGINA ASTORGA. Third Division. Sirs/Mesdames: Quoted hereunder, for your information is a resolution of this Court dated SEPT. ... G.R. No. 151372 (Regina Astorga v. SMART Communications, Inc., et al.) This treats of the Motion for Clarification dated 28 June 2006 filed by SMART Communications, Inc. and Ann ... WebMyLegalWhiz is a trusted online legal research and services technology for legal professionals, educators, students, businesses, employees and the general public. diamond saddlery
Philippine Jurisprudence - January 2008 - Supra Source
WebSMART COMMUNICATIONS v. REGINA M. ASTORGA, GR NO. 148132, 2008-01-23. Facts: Regina M. Astorga (Astorga) was employed by respondent Smart Communications, … WebDec 19, 2015 · x-----x G.R. No. 151372 January 28, 2008 REGINA M. ASTORGA, petitioner, vs. SMART COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and ANN MARGARET V. SANTIAGO, respondents. D E C I S I O N NACHURA, J. : For the resolution of the Court are three consolidated petitions for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court. WebPETITIONER: SMART COMMUNICATIONS, INC. RESPONDENT: REGINA M. ASTORGA SUMMARY: Petitioner was dismissed due to redundancy following a joint venture by SMART. Petitioner filed a complaint for illegal dismissal. The company demanded that she either pay the market value of a car given to her as part of her employment benefits or to return the … cisco jabber how to create a chat room